Commentary
Housing supply, planning, tax and feasibility — analysis written by Max and republished from LinkedIn.
-
Housing supplyThe Victorian Government Housing Statement identified 10 Activity Centres across Melbourne
The type of homes, mix, and how much they are expected to cost remains TBD.
-
Great world cities Barcelona, Paris, New York, Singapore often romanticised as models of equity & accessibility.
-
$5.1b into building social housing – 8,400 dwellings (6,200 new + 2,200 replacements) across 44 sites $655m to create around 500 build-to-rent dwellings over 3 years $253.7m to pay for planners and technology to speed up development…
-
Lots of people have asked for my take on the new Victorian Government Housing Targets 2051. Here’s my unfiltered perspective.
-
The 80,000 p.a. target in the Victorian Government housing Statement will clearly not be reached.
-
Beyond stamp duty concessions, what else could be done, quickly, to boost attractiveness for potential buyers?
-
Let’s assume, despite the evidence to needing the contrary, the line is held that dense, apartment living is the only way forward for housing supply.
-
I attended the UDIAV Summit at zinc last week and comments from the Victorian Planning Minister got me thinking.
-
In short, even if you could magically: reduce construction costs by $1,000/m2 across the building remove ALL government taxes…
-
I’ve argued that the development sector has a disproportionate burden in meeting efficiency targets with energy ratings for new homes.