Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes

Housing and welfare groups criticise the 2022 pre-election budget's temporary cost-of-living measures as short-term fixes. UDIA national president Max Shifman welcomes funding for migration and housing supply, warning that without more supply the affordability crisis will overwhelm government funding.

As I told realestate.com.au: “The federal government budget delivers on some important areas which will drive the economic recovery, bringing back migration and stripping away some of the barriers to delivering housing supply.”

I also said: “The importance of boosting supply across the housing spectrum cannot be underestimated – without it, the escalating affordability crisis will tip more and more Australians into crisis and overwhelm government funding.”

And I added: “Lack of major and enabling infrastructure is blocking delivery of housing across Australia – these initiatives are crucial to righting the imbalance housing market.”

Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes
Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes (page 2)
Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes (page 3)
Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes (page 4)
Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes (page 5)
Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes (page 6)
Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes (page 7)
Pre-election Budget Criticised for Short-Term Fizz, Not Long-Term Fixes (page 8)

realestate.com.au, 30 March 2022Read the full article